The Tantrum: Are Men No Longer Necessary? Part Three

(This is the Tantrum, in which Dadwagon’s writers debate one question over the course of a week. For previous Tantrums, click here.)

Chimp-shot-dead-after-going-ape-6490322I clocked Hanna Rosin’s Atlantic article on The End of Men, which is the subject of this week’s Tantrum, at over 8,600 words. The Constitution of these United States, including all 27 freaking Amendments, doesn’t even hit 8,100 words.

Am I jealous? You bet. I get paid by the word. And given that I work mostly for a magazine that loves listicles, I don’t get to write a lot of words at any one time.

I disagree that it’s not worth reading the piece, though. Rosin is a good writer. She keeps things from getting dreary. But in the end, let me just sweep aside her overbroad arguments (“A report on the unprecedented role reversal now under way—and its vast cultural consequences”) as well as Matt’s counterpoint (“Men, let’s embrace our new uselessness!”). I’m more in Theodore’s camp: “There is, really, no such thing as Men,” he wrote. “There are specific men in specific places doing specific things.”

As Theodore pointed out, there’s a tendency for moms to push fathers aside—even beyond the natural limitations of what fathers can offer an infant.

So let me rephrase this whole conversation: If you’re worried that men are useless, or that you are useless, then make yourself useful. Push the wife out of the way, be there first with the diaper. Or if you need a manlier contribution, build a crib or treefort, paint the walls of the nursery. The individual men who are useless—at home, work, or anywhere else—shouldn’t have anyone else to blame for it besides themselves. Women may have passed us in education and other metrics, but we are far from being oppressed by them. So if you’re not contributing, look in your man-mirror.

Side note: I’ve got no beef with the length of this article, but there is something that needs more editing: The video with Rosin and her family (including husband David Plotz, whose writing about Barry Scheck I quoted in my most recent TIME article, because he’s that good). Plotz and Rosin and their kids don’t prove much about the gender wars (although the daughter does get points for using more concrete examples in her arguments). They do prove that my people (yes, the Chosen ones) might be a bit overly analytical/argumentative, even from a young age. And that the Atlantic needs to hire a couple more video editors. Nevertheless, here’s the video, if you’ve got more than five minutes:

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Nathan. Bookmark the permalink.

About Nathan

Nathan Thornburgh is a contributing writer and former senior editor at TIME Magazine who has also written for the New York Times, newyorker.com and, of course, the Phnom Penh Post. He suspects that he is messing up his kids, but just isn’t sure exactly how.

3 thoughts on “The Tantrum: Are Men No Longer Necessary? Part Three

  1. Now we’re getting somewhere. I think you just made the perfect point: If you feel useless, make yourself useful. Bam. It really can be that simple.

    I know that when I start to feel a little less than relevant in the home, it’s because I’m allowing it to happen. If I don’t wash the dishes, my wife will do it later. If I don’t plan play dates and swimming lessons, she’ll do it. Suddenly, I’m feeling like I’m not an integral part of the team, but it’s my own fault.

  2. Like most things in life, it’s all about personal responsibility.

    One of my bucket-list items is to leave an 8,600-word comment on someone’s blog, preferably a “Wordless Wednesday.”

  3. It’s like when my wife and I went to a Salsa club after having taken two lessons. I was all, “This isn’t working. We suck. But why? We were good in the class.” And she goes, “You’re not leading. You have to lead. Or someone has to anyway. Do you want me to?” And I was like, “Screw, this, I’m getting a cocktail,” and I went off and sulked at the bar.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *