The Tantrum: Should I Send my Kid to Private School? Part 2

February 24th, 2010  |  by  |  Published in Edumucation, The Tantrum  |  9 Comments

An empty suit

An empty suit

Despite vast differences in intellectual heft (he wins) and hairline (I win), DadWagoner Theodore and I do have something in common: we are both caught in the maw of the New York public school “universal” pre-K bureaucracy.

Theodore complained righteously about the lack of available spaces, but it’s even worse than he wrote, because you’re not guaranteed a spot in your district until kindergarten (at least according to the hivemind at YouBeMom). For pre-K, you’re only guaranteed a spot somewhere in New York. Which raises the question: how ’bout a 90 minute commute Staten Island each day?

But despite the odds, we will take whichever public school will have us. Dalia was in a private school she loves this past year. They were kind, thoughtful, and progressive. But they just sent a bill for $28,000 for next year’s (full-day) tuition.  It is an astounding amount, and far, far beyond our reach.

I should have known things were gonna get pricey when the school’s headmistress began posting about early childhood education at Huffington Post (no joke). Exposure has a price.

But as sad as we are to be leaving that school (and if you’re a school employee and reading this–we are going to officially turn down the spot tomorrow), I am glad to be getting to public schools finally.

My wife and I were always in public schools, she in Los Angeles, me in a small town (Key West) and a big city (San Francisco). I never liked private school kids. I didn’t really know any, but I projected a lot of my anxieties about money and manners (and my lack thereof) on them. In San Francisco, they seemed so walled-off from the rest of the city, and at such a young age. I just didn’t see myself raising kids in private school.

That’s still true. I don’t understand why people spend a fortune on primary and secondary education. Because the goal is college, right? And if anything, I think going to a fancy prep school can make it more difficult to get into the best colleges. This is debated heavily, and one of the true rock stars of college admissions, Marilee Jones (yeah, I know she had that scandal, but still) wouldn’t admit as much in my interviews with her. But I read between the lines and inferred it a bit, and besides, it’s common sense: If you’re a great student from a hardscrabble public institution, you’re just more impressive than a great student from a silver spoon academy.

It worked for my wife and me, and it’s our plan for our kids.

Staten Island, here we come.


Responses

  1. Jack says:

    February 24th, 2010at 4:58 pm(#)

    Because the goal is college, right?

    I don’t know about that. Isn’t it a bit more complicated.

  2. Sid says:

    February 24th, 2010at 5:48 pm(#)

    Ok, I know I’m a heavily-sheltered Canadian but $28000 US for a year of elementary!? Five years ago I spent the about same amount on three years of tuition for law degree from one of the top schools up here. Seriously, that’s crazy.

  3. Carly says:

    February 25th, 2010at 9:59 pm(#)

    For PreK, of course, in most parts of the country, there simply is no public option. And if it does exist, it starts at age 4 and is often half-day. (My glorious state of residence, NJ, is one of the few states to offer universal public preK for 3s and 4s, but then only in the cities.) So in most places any working parent who wants her 3 or 4 year old out with his friends all day instead of sulking around the house asking for more play-doh over, and over, has to pay.

  4. Erin says:

    March 15th, 2010at 7:02 pm(#)

    I stumbled upon this post a little late, so I have no idea if leaving a comment even matters or not, but I disagree with this post. My parents sent me to my local Seattle public school for first grade and it was a disaster. I was one of thirty kids and I came in already knowing basic reading and my numbers, etc. I am an experiential learner and like to be engaged. As one of thirty, it was impossible for the teacher to meaningfully teach to my while trying to work with kids who hadn’t slept the night before or eaten that morning. The result? I was bored and/or in trouble all the time. So, the next year I went to a progressive private school and continued on that route until college. My father regrets it because he sees all that money as wasted since I am neither lawyer nor doctor, but my mom and I know I would have been lost in the public system. You pay the money because you don’t like the alternatives.

    Now I live in Oakland, in a horrible public school district and face choices I don’t really like for my son. We can’t really afford the nicer neighborhoods or private school and there’s no way we’d send him to our district school. But I’d rather stretch and sacrifice than see my son who is an excited learner become beaten down and disengaged. We all make our choices and I believe that you have oversimplified this one.

  5. Nathan says:

    March 15th, 2010at 7:23 pm(#)

    Thanks for commenting. Even if the post has been up for awhile it doesn’t mean that we’ve actually figured anything out yet or come to any conclusions! I agree that it really does depend on the child, and I certainly wouldn’t choose private school just in the hopes that they would grow up to be a doctor or lawyer. It’s not about an investment in the sense that you should see financial dividends.

    But I would hope that in New York, at least, there are charter schools and such that will give a diversity of options for kids with different learning styles. That’s the idea anyhow. My heart is with public schools, and I’d rather be a part of pressuring them to change for the better, not leaving them altogether. Of course, we also live in a decent school district, and I know some in the East Bay just aren’t. I hope our stance doesn’t end up hurting my kids, but only time will tell.

Trackbacks

    The Tantrum: Should I Send My Kids to Private School? Part 3 | DADWAGON
  1. "Universal" actually means "Unavailable" | DADWAGON
  2. Matt is raising a LUSH! | DADWAGON
  3. Baby meets Bureaucracy | DADWAGON

Leave a Response



  

tips/suggestions/grievances

Recent Comments

  • Liz: She is an educated fool. It’s all or nothing with her. She is either a stereotypical 50s mom...
  • Matt: It’s good to know that you and I are not alone, Lani! Except, of course, that you and I actually are...
  • Lani: This is hysterical. I love a good and dark child story. And to think I stopped telling...
  • Beth Winegarner: Well said.
  • Eddie: Hurrah!

DadWagon Reads!

DadWagon Q&A: Joel Stein, Author of Man Made | DADWAGON
"It would be tragic if this were your last piece of journalism." —Joel Stein on ...

May 16th 11:33am • Comment

Are Dads the New Moms?
Though losing ground as husbands and providers, men are finding a new role, writes Susan ...

May 15th 4:16pm • Comment

The Coming Real Estate Disaster for White-People Brooklyn
So the Brooklyn baby boom for the white hipster crowd is in full amazing swing. ...

May 15th 12:37pm • Comment

Awesomest damn kid of the day.

How to wake up a kid - ( Breed- Nirvana ) How to wake up a sleeping kid. Only 3 years old! He wakes up playing the drums in his sleep. Very funny! Eventyrlig måte å våkne opp til Nirvana musikk.

May 14th 12:58pm • Comment